In an email newsletter Zopa Italy encouraged its member to spread the word about Zopa to friends and relatives. Zopa says it is for 'a good reason': Zopa Italy pledges to lend $1 on Kiva for each new member that registers at Zopa Italy before January 15th. Everybody can monitor how much Zopa invested on this lender page at Kiva.
I am sure that Kiva will highly appreciate this promotion, a target audience that is already interested in p2p lending gets introduced to Kiva's concept. But I am not sure if that is a good marketing campaign for Zopa. Should the lenders decide Kiva is an interesting concept they might lend their money at Kiva instead of at Zopa. Maybe Zopa speculates lenders will invest in both. Or Zopa wants the added social angle to increase chances of press coverage.
What do you think? Discuss this at the Zopa forum.
(Source: Email newsletter from Zopa Italy, Dec. 27th)
Matt Flannery of Kiva.org describes in a blog post which obstacles Kiva has to overcome to make accounting not a too time consuming task for the local fireld partners (MFIs). With some MFIs having over thousand loans and slow internet connection Kiva needed to find a solution that saved time.
About a year ago, we realized that many of our Field Partners were having trouble doing so. The sheer number of page loads was making it prohibitively difficult for a Field Partner to register repayments on time, even when the actual borrower collections in the field were happening like clockwork. Thus, we introduced "exception-based" repayments. The idea, used widely in MFI accounting systems already, is to have regularly scheduled payment registered automatically in a system unless the loan officer marks an exception — an event signaling that something went wrong and the borrower did not pay the full amount. Since borrowers typically repay 95% (or so) of the time, loan officers only need to register something 5% of the time.
Kiva's first whack at exception based payments was very crude. The feature was written by me in late '06 in between blog entries and trying to keep the site up. Many of our Field Partners adopted the feature out of necessity and it saved them a lot of time. However, it was very difficult to mark an exception, so most of them never did. Thus, many of our Field Partners never mark exceptions and just repay all of their loans on time, even in the 5% case where the borrower defaults. This creates misleadingly high repayment stats on the site and we are working to correct that.
Kiva plans to have group loans. The post does not describe in detail, how group loans will work, but I am looking forward to examine this feature:
In addition to that, we are rolling out a number of features to further reduce the work required by our Field Partners and increase transparency. Group Loans will go live on the site this week. This will allow Field Partners to post up groups of up to 50 on the site as an individual loan application on the site. Group-lending is common practice in microfinance, but was not well supported by Kiva until now.
Also Kiva will change how currency exchange risks are handled:
we will be introducing local currency support for all of our Field Partners. This will allow the disbursement and repayment amounts on the site more closely mirror the actual accounting books of each MFI. This creates more transparency around financial flows. It also paves the way for a future reality where our partners will not need to bear currency risk. Hard currency lending has fallen out of favor in the microfinance world and we hope to soon be on the cutting edge of local currency lending.
Note that on MyC4.com for most loans the borrower has to take the currency exchange risk. Loans with small amounts are paid out in local currency, while large loans are paid out in Euro.
After a great traffic surge due to media coverage in The Today Show and The Oprah Winfrey Show new lenders funded loans faster then Kiva.org could list new ones. When Kiva reached nearly 1 million page views per day it was completly sold out temporarily. Right now there some loan listings, but Kiva limited bidding to $25 per lender.
So far the default rate for Kiva has been 0.17% on a loan volume of $9.965.000 (4.4% of loans are one month late). When compared to Prosper.com default rates, that is an extremly good result. So far the MRI on Kiva with the worst performance is REDC Bulgaria, followed by an MRI that organizes loans to people in Uganda, Kenya and Tanzania.
Another interesting figure: The average time a listing is online at Kiva.org until it is fully funded is 1.24 days.
Deutsche Bank research published a new 4 page report giving a good summary on the state of p2p lending. The report mentions Prosper, Zopa, Smava, Kiva and Boober. (Found through Marketingfacts.nl)
I started lending on Kiva.org 6 month ago. At Kiva everone can lend to small entrepreneurs in developing countries. At first I funded only 4 loans each with the minimum amount of 25 US$. Lenders do not earn interest on Kiva loans. Usually loans are for terms between 6 and 18 months. When I started I did not really expect all my loans to be repaid. But I wanted to support it, since I thought it was an innovative approach to a good cause. Meanwhile I changed my mind. One of my loans was already repaid in full recently and the others are paid on time. This led me to the decision to fund more loans on Kiva microfinance.
